It is NOT intuitive :-) I've never looked at their Tab output but their standard staff output is, without a doubt, the "gold standard" once you work your way through the intricacies of the data entry. Yes, I've had LilyPond on my PC for many years, but unless they have made major changes in the past 6 months, or so, data entry is done with a text editor into an ASCII file which is then processed by LilyPond. I am beginning to study classical guitar and I'm not particularly interested in chords and chord diagrams at this time. unreadable when printedĢ) it hasn't been updated since 2009 and seems to be deadģ) their forums seem to have been closed in July 2012 I have installed TuxGuitar and it seems to do what I want, except:ġ) the font they use is absolutely AWFUL. Do not hesitate to contact me for further explanations if needed. Though it is anyway much better when putting fingering on the score ! It is also possible to put the number of the cord played, in NWC use an item text with chars Alt-0128 to Alt-0134 in wingdings font (I set it to user4 font) and it will give you the # in a circle.Īnother advantage of using classical notation is that you also sho when the note ENDs up. But tab's give an idea of the placement of the fingers. It seems ok to me (I just tried 'Go, tell it on the mountain.' and what it transcribed (8 measures since it is an unregistered version) seems to be playable.Ībout your P.S., yes "normal" notes is better (in particular for having an idea of the melody at the first glance), but the tablatures (origin of the classical notation, it was used for the luth at that time).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |